Fifteen years after the custodial death of 23-year-old Begya Pawar, a member of the Pardhi community, a District and Sessions Court in Maharashtra’s Washim has sentenced nine police personnel, including the then Station House Officer (SHO) of Risod Police Station, to life imprisonment.
The court held the officers guilty after a prolonged trial into Pawar’s death in police custody on May 10, 2011. The prosecution argued that Pawar, who had no criminal record, was picked up from his home for questioning before allegedly being brutally assaulted inside the police station, leading to his death.
A post-mortem documenting 44 injuries and multiple fractures, along with the Maharashtra CID investigation and testimonies from 47 witnesses, formed the basis of the prosecution’s case. Following the verdict, the convicted officers were taken into custody.
Reacting to the judgment, Pawar’s elderly parents said they had finally received justice after waiting for 15 years, with his mother thanking the court, the prosecution and the CID investigation team while reiterating that her son had committed no crime.
Fifteen-Year Wait Ends
The verdict marks the culmination of one of Maharashtra’s longest-running custodial death cases, bringing a measure of closure to a family that spent over a decade seeking accountability. According to the prosecution, Begya Pawar was taken from his home in Risod, Washim district, at around 3 a.m. on May 10, 2011, for questioning.
By the following morning, his family was informed that he had died while in police custody. Medical evidence later became central to the case, with the post-mortem reportedly recording 44 injuries, including multiple fractures, findings that strengthened allegations of custodial torture.
The investigation, transferred to the Maharashtra Criminal Investigation Department (CID), concluded that Pawar had been subjected to severe assault while in custody and filed a chargesheet against nine police personnel.
During the trial, the court relied on medical evidence, forensic findings, witness testimonies and the CID’s investigation before convicting all nine accused, including former Risod Police Station in-charge Mahadev Manik Dhande.
Two of the convicted officers had retired by the time the judgment was delivered, and all nine were remanded to custody following sentencing. Outside the courtroom, Pawar’s mother expressed gratitude to the judiciary, the prosecution and the CID team, saying her family had finally received justice after a 15-year struggle and maintaining that her son had been innocent.
A Case That Tested Accountability
The legal battle began almost immediately after Pawar’s death, when his parents alleged that their attempt to register a complaint at the same police station was refused because it named the then SHO among the accused. Supported by members of the Pardhi community, they staged protests demanding the registration of a criminal case and an independent investigation.
The case was eventually transferred to the Maharashtra CID, which conducted an extensive inquiry involving witness statements, forensic evidence, medical reports and police records.
The prosecution maintained that Pawar had no criminal antecedents and was illegally detained before being assaulted in custody. According to reports of the judgment, the court found that lawful procedures governing detention had not been followed and observed that while police personnel may use reasonable force in the discharge of their duties, the force used in this case far exceeded legal limits.
The verdict has once again drawn attention to the issue of custodial deaths in India and the challenges of ensuring accountability in cases where allegations are made against law enforcement officials.
It has also highlighted the experiences of members of denotified communities such as the Pardhi community, who have long raised concerns about discrimination and disproportionate policing despite the repeal of colonial-era laws that once labelled several tribes as “criminal tribes”.
Legal experts have noted that convictions of police personnel in custodial death cases remain relatively uncommon, making the Washim judgment significant in the broader conversation on institutional accountability and the rule of law.
The Logical Indian’s Perspective
Justice delayed can never erase a family’s grief, but it can reaffirm the principle that no individual or institution is above the law. The Washim court’s verdict is a reminder that accountability is essential to preserving public trust in democratic institutions, particularly when allegations involve those entrusted with enforcing the law. At the same time, the case underscores the importance of independent investigations, robust forensic evidence and a judicial process that remains accessible to vulnerable communities seeking justice against powerful institutions.
It also brings into focus the lived realities of denotified communities, who continue to speak of prejudice and systemic exclusion decades after discriminatory colonial laws were repealed. While the legal process may continue through appeals, the judgment reinforces the need for policing that is rooted in constitutional values, transparency and respect for human dignity.
Also read: EPS 2026 Explained: What’s Changing and What’s Staying the Same for Millions of EPFO Subscribers
